Judge Sides With Charlie Kirk Assassin in New Ruling PROTECTING Murderer, Banning Cameras? RIGGED!

13
2573
IMAGE ABOVE FROM VIDEO BELOW

TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW

Charlie Kirk was NOT given the option to have no cameras at his demise and YET this guy gets that courtesy. Unbelievable!!!.

The murder was televised but not the trial? That’s not right.

13 COMMENTS

  1. This is like a 2 edge sword. The public does deserve the right to see the trial, but in the early 1960s a highly publicized murder trial was televised and resulted in an innocent man being thrown in jail for life. An appeal was made and the publicizing of that trial led to the innocent man’s acquittal because his constitutional rights were violated by the television news services. The idea for the TV show and movie “The Fugitive” were based on that trial. This is why so many trials are NOT televised. Even the Charlie Manson trial was not televised and only parts of the O.J. Simpson trial were televised. But, I’m all for a public execution of that murdering POS by hanging him.

  2. Not surprised Lib s and dem judges are for the thug most time and AGAINST anything that for God That is why they want God OUT of this Country For them its AGENDA over everything else

  3. The patsy must fear the deep state’s way of silencing him.🤔 Because there is a tie there, they just haven’t found it yet or overlooked it. It will come out, how soon? Is the question.

  4. Wilddog, I agree. They won’t show Charlie Kirk’s demise because they always try to sanitize death. It’s “too graphic” for the public to see.

  5. Heaven forbid he should have his feelings hurt by being shown in prison garb! What about the vision WE will cary in OUR mind of Charlie being murdered? What about our feelings? Since when are feelings being considered when enforcing the law?? That judge needs to have a come to Jesus discussion behind the barn!

  6. These rogue judges who side with the criminal should be required to serve with them in prison, same cell.

    The murder had no compassion, therefore they need none in return from a democratic judge.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.